Ridge & Downes - Law Firm

  • Presentation on the 2011 Amendments to the Act

    Click here to view our presentation.

    Contact us to give a presentation at your next meeting on how the change affect your members and their families.

  • Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect

    It is difficult to believe that something as terrible as neglect can be perpetrated by caregivers entrusted with the safety of your elderly or disabled loved ones. As difficult as that may be to imagine, the sad truth is that neglect, abuse and exploitation of residents in nursing homes occurs all too frequently.

    As our society has grown, so have the life expectancies of its people. The increased life expectancy has resulted in the growth of nursing and long-term care facilities. Many facilities take excellent care of their residents and patients but some have demonstrated themselves to be unworthy of the patronage of our sick and elderly family members.

    There is no excuse for an elderly and infirm resident to be over-medicated, under fed, handled violently, restrained from physical activity or left in soiled linens. The oldest members of our society deserve our respect and admiration. They should be treated accordingly.

    There are legal remedies to this abuse. If you suspect that a cherished family member has suffered from abuse or neglect at a nursing home or long-term care facility, please contact our office for a consultation. 

  • Utilization Review Under the New Act

    One of the changes made to the Act deals with a facet of workers' compensation law known as "utilization review" or "UR" for short. Insurance companies have used utilization reviews to attempt to refuse payment for medical services requested by an injured worker's treating doctor. The process involves the insurance company sending your medical records to be reviewed by a doctor (usually in another state) to rule on whether certain treatments may be necessary. The UR doctor does not interview or examine the injured worker but merely looks at the medical records and proposed treatment and decides whether or not he or she thinks it is necessary. Often, the reviewing doctor is not even trained in the same specialty as the doctor recommending the treatment.

    Prior to the recent changes to the Act, UR reports were not considered heavily by Arbitrators and Commissioners – and for good reason. UR reports ignore the subjective complaints and problems of individual patients and adhere to a strict diagram of what is appropriate treatment and what is not..

    Now, the Act puts the burden on the injured worker to refute the findings of these utilization reviews. The injured worker must show that a variance from the standards of care used by the UR physician is reasonably required to cure or relieve the effects of his or her injury. The Act also requires that an Arbitrator or Commissioner must specifically address UR evidence in their decisions. They can no longer choose to give them little consideration.

    This change will require an injured worker and his or her attorney to litigate medical issues more frequently - costing the injured worker time and money. It will increase the likelihood that a claim will have to proceed to hearing in front of an Arbitrator. It will require an injured worker's attorney to take the deposition of UR professionals which may result in the delay of appropriate medical treatment.

    If you have been injured and your treatment has been denied pursuant to a Utilization Review, please contact our office so that we may fight for your right to reasonable medical treatment.

Read the Ridge & Downes blog – learn about important issues and current affairs.


Recent Blog Posts

© 2010 by Ridge & Downes - All rights reserved.